Influence of internal organizational environment elements on the implementation of risk management in higher education institutions: a case study in southern Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2024.e97171Keywords:
Internal Organizational Environment, Organizational Risk Management, Public OrganizationsAbstract
Goal: This study aims to identify and analyze elements within the internal organizational environment that influence risk management in a Public Higher Education Institution in southern Brazil, focusing on internal factors such as cultural aspects and work pressure, which impact the formulation of policies and mitigation strategies.
Methodology/approach: Utilizing a quantitative approach, this survey-based research gathered data through an online questionnaire. Predominantly structured with closed-ended questions on a Likert scale, the survey targeted technical-administrative and teaching staff, yielding responses from 684 participants.
Originality/relevance: This study underscores the interplay between the internal organizational milieu and risk management within public educational institutions. It delves into a domain that, until now, has been scarcely charted and minimally documented in academic literature.
Main findings: Two factors, "Cultural Aspects" and "Work Pressure," were found to positively influence risk management. Conversely, roles such as "Heading a Sector" and practices like "Procedure Standardization" demonstrated a lesser impact.
Theoretical contributions: The research augments the theoretical comprehension of organizational risk management by introducing a set of factors that may guide future studies in this realm.
Management contributions: This study furnishes valuable insights for crafting risk management policies, bolstering stakeholder interactions, and providing a foundation for strategic decision-making, all with a view to enhancing managerial efficacy in similar institutions.
References
Abdel-Basset, M., Gunasekaran, M., Mohamed, M., & Chilamkurti, N. (2019). A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90(1), 489–502.
Araújo, R. F., Rocha, E. M. P., & Carvalhais, J. N. (2015). Inovações em organizações públicas: Estudo dos fatores que influenciam um ambiente inovador no estado de Minas Gerais. RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 12(3), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.11606/rai.v12i3.100929
Ashok, M., Dhaheri, M. S. A. B. A. M., Madan, R., & Dzandu, M. D. (2021). How to Counter Organisational Inertia to Enable Knowledge Management Practices Adoption in Public Sector Organisations. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0700
Baird, K. M., & Harrison, G. L. (2017). The association between organizational culture and the use of management initiatives in the public sector. Financial Accountability & Management, 33(3), 311–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12125
Bispo, C. A. F. (2006). Um novo modelo de pesquisa de clima organizacional. Production, 16, 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-65132006000200007
Brettler, J. W., Arcila, G. P. G., Aumala, T., Best, A., Campbell, N. R. C., Cyr, S., Gamarra, A., Jaffe, M. G., Rosa, M. J. D. la, Maldonado, J., Ojeda, C. N., Haughton, M., Malcolm, T., Perez, V., Rodríguez, G., Rosende, A., González, Y. V., Wood, P. W., Zúñiga, E. C., & Ordúñez, P. (2022). Fatores Impulsionadores E Scorecards Para Melhorar O Controle Da Hipertensão Arterial Na Atenção Primária: Recomendações Do Grupo De Inovação Da Iniciativa HEARTS Nas Américas. Revista Panamericana De Salud Pública. https://doi.org/10.26633/rpsp.2022.68
Brito, de S. D., & Caldas, F. S. (2016). A evolução da carreira de magistério de ensino básico, técnico e tecnológico (EBTT) nos Institutos Federais. Revista Brasileira da Educação Profissional e Tecnológica, 1(10), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.15628/rbept.2016.4024
Bromiley, P., McShane, M., Nair, A., & Rustambekov, E. (2015). Enterprise risk management: Review, critique, and research directions. Long range planning, 48(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.07.005
Brustbauer, J. (2016). Enterprise risk management in SMEs: Towards a structural model. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614542853
Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Administrative science quarterly, 54(1), 32–57. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.1.32
Casagrande, B., Brighenti, J., Bortoluzzi, C. A. P., & de Camargo, T. F. (2018). Avaliação da extensão dos processos de gestão de riscos em cooperativas de crédito do Estado de Santa Catarina. Brazilian Journal of Development, 4(4), 1610–1632. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv4n4-200
Chen, J., Jiao, L., & Harrison, G. (2019). Organisational culture and enterprise risk management: The Australian not‐for‐profit context. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 78(3), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12382
Child, J. (1972). Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. sociology, 6(1), 1–22. http://www.jstor.org/stable/42851133
Ciocoiu, C. N., Prioteasa, A. L., & Colesca, S. E. (2020). Risk management implementation for sustainable development of Romanian SMEs: A fuzzy approach. Amfiteatru Economic, 22(55), 726–741. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2020/55/726
Cochrane, G. (2018). Max Weber’s vision for bureaucracy. Springer.
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. (2007). COSO Gerenciamento de Riscos Corporativos—Estrutura Integrada. COSO Gerenciamento de Riscos Corporativos - Estrutura Integrada.
de Paula, R. R. (2019). Análise de Risco na Introdução de Novas Tecnologias em Startups [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de Lisboa]. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/19923
Engemann, K. N., & Scott, C. W. (2020). Voice in safety-oriented organizations: Examining the intersection of hierarchical and mindful social contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.05.002
Ernst Kossek, E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.139
Faghihi, A., Gholipour, A., Abooyee Ardakan, M., Ghalibaf Asl, H., & Asadi, A. (2019). Validation of Dimensions and Component of Risk Culture: Using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Public Management Researches, 11(42), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.22111/jmr.2019.4514
Ferreira, A., & Gimenez, P. E. O. (2014). Implantação do Trabalho em Equipe no chão de fábrica: Estudo de caso em uma indústria brasileira. Revista Vianna Sapiens, 5(2), 27–27.
Ferro, D. dos S. (2015). Gestão de riscos corporativos: Um estudo multicaso sobre seus métodos e técnicas [Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de São Paulo - USP]. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.12.2016.tde-19012016-150607
Filyppova, S., Kholod, B., Prodanova, L., Ivanchenkova, L., Ivanchenkov, V., & Bashynska, I. (2019). Risk management through systematization: Risk management culture. http://dx.doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5601.098319
Fischmann, A. A., & Almeida, M. I. R. de. (1991). Planejamento estratégico na prática. Em Planejamento estratégico na prática (p. 164–164).
Fleury, M. T. L. (2009). Organizational culture and the renewal of competences. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-76922009000100002
Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36.
Greenhaus, J. H. (1971). Self-esteem as an influence on occupational choice and occupational satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(71)90008-X
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of management review, 10(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
Guiotti, I. X. P., Costa, A. de J. B., & Botelho, D. R. (2020). Gestão de Riscos em Entidades Fechadas de Previdência Complementar no Brasil: Legislações, Teorias e Práticas de Mercado. Revista Ciências Administrativas, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5020/2318-0722.2020.26.1.9107
Haberkamp, Â. M., Hoppen, N., & Kronbauer, C. A. (2021). Julgamento E Tomada De Decisão Dos Contadores No Processo De Controle Do Ativo Imobilizado. Revista Universo Contábil. https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2020103
Hagigi, M., & Sivakumar, K. (2009). Managing diverse risks: An integrative framework. Journal of International Management, 15(3), 286–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2009.01.001
Junior, V. H. K. (2020). Gestão de riscos no setor público brasileiro: Uma nova lógica de accountability? Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 14, e163964–e163964. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2020.163964
Kalamaki, F. R., Mahmoudi, G., & Charati, J. Y. (2021). A Model for Organizational Entrepreneurship with Organizational Culture Approach in Iran’s Teaching Hospitals. Ethiopian journal of health sciences, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.4314%2Fejhs.v31i2.25
Kuratko, D. F., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2014). Why implementing corporate innovation is so difficult. Business Horizons, 57(5), 647–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.05.007
Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2013.08.009
Lizote, S. A., Morais, M. L. S. de, Bazzanello, V. L., & Matuschak, J. (2022). Relação Entre Assunção De Risco, Práticas De Custos E Desempenho: Revista Rosa Dos Ventos - Turismo E Hospitalidade. https://doi.org/10.18226/21789061.v14i4p1289
Lordello, S. R., & Silva, I. M. da. (2017). Resolução no 510/2016 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde: Um panorama geral.
Malhotra, N. K. (2019). Pesquisa de Marketing-: Uma orientação aplicada. Bookman Editora.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). Preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic medicine, 5(1), 85–92. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/00006842-194301000-00012
Massaini, S. A. (2017). Gestão de riscos corporativos (ERM) e sua relação com o desempenho inovador de empresas de grande porte no Brasil [Tese de Doutorado]. Universidade de São Paulo.
Mishra, B. K., Rolland, E., Satpathy, A., & Moore, M. (2019). A framework for enterprise risk identification and management: The resource-based view. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(2), 162–188. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-12-2017-1751
Moeller, R. R. (2007). COSO enterprise risk management: Understanding the new integrated ERM framework. John Wiley & Sons.
Nitzke, J., Hansen-Schirra, S., & Canfora, C. (2019). Risk management and post-editing competence. The Journal of Specialised Translation, 31, 239–259.
Nunes, T. S., da Rosa Tolfo, S., & Garcia, I. S. (2018). Valores organizacionais declarados e praticados na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 10(2), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v0i0.5323
Oliveira, S. J. R. de. (2016). Gestão de riscos em organizações públicas: O caso da Superintendência de Seguros Privados [Dissertação de Mestrado].
Park, T.-Y., Park, S., & Barry, B. (2022). Incentive effects on ethics. Academy of Management Annals, 16(1), 297–333. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2020.0251
Pinto, J. B., Nogueira, R. J. da C. C., & Cerquinho, K. G. (2020). Avaliação das políticas de gestão de riscos das universidades federais quanto ao atendimento à instrução normativa 01/2016. Brazilian Journal of Production Engineering, 6(2), 227–244.
Ramos, K. H. C., Alves, R. R., Graça, G. A. da, & Almeida, D. V. (2023). Aplicação De BPM Ágil Na Administração Pública Brasileira. Revista De Ciências Da Administração. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8077.2022.e84357
Rhoden, J. T., Bertollo, D. L., Eckert, A., & De Paula, R. L. (2019). Modelo COSO ERM na Avaliação de Sistemas de Controles Internos: Análise em uma indústria de concreto e cerâmica do Vale do Caí/RS. Pensamento & Realidade, 34(2), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.23925/2237-4418.2019v34i2p43-63
Rodrigues, R. C. (2017). A atuação da auditoria interna nas Universidades Federais Brasileiras. https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v13i4.11151
Rowan, B. (1982). Organizational structure and the institutional environment: The case of public schools. Administrative science quarterly, 259–279. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392303
Roy, R., & Konwar, J. (2020). Workplace happiness: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(1), 4452–4459.
Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., Gutierrez, L., Streimikiene, D., Alrasheedi, M., Saeidi, S. P., & Mardani, A. (2021). The influence of enterprise risk management on firm performance with the moderating effect of intellectual capital dimensions. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 34(1), 122–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1776140
Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2021). Weberian bureaucracy. Em Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.
Sell, F. F., Beuren, I. M., & Lavarda, C. E. F. (2020). Influência de fatores contingenciais no desempenho municipal: Evidências inferenciais. Revista de Contabilidade e Organizações, 14, 164058. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-6486.rco.2020.164058
Sjöberg, L. (2000). Explaining risk perception: An empirical evaluation of cultural theory (Vol. 1). Rotunde.
Sousa, M. R. B. D. D., Finati, C. R. D., Perez, M. C., & Duarte, K. S. B. (2018). Gestão de risco nas instituições universitárias: Uma análise comparativa da metodologia da Controladoria Geral da União e do Ministério do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento e Gestão. XVII.
Souza, F. S. R. N. de, Braga, M. V. de A., Cunha, A. S. M. da, & Sales, P. D. B. de. (2020). Incorporação de modelos internacionais de gerenciamento de riscos na normativa federal. Revista de Administração Pública, 54(1), 59–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-761220180117
Taran, Y., Boer, H., & Lindgren, P. (2013). Incorporating enterprise risk management in the business model innovation process. Journal of Business Models, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jbm.v1i1.618
Turíbio, E. V., & Santos, E. H. (2017). A reforma do estado e a gestão democrática na universidade pública brasileira. Administração Pública e Gestão Social, 9(3), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.21118/apgs.v1i3.5103
Vahle, J. L., Bhat, V., & Wood, C. E. (2023). Risk Management and Communication: Building Trust and Credibility With the Public. Haschek and Rousseaux’s Handbook of Toxicologic Pathology, Volume 2: Safety Assessment Environmental Toxicologic Pathology, 629–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821047-5.00022-1
Zainudin, Z., Samad, S. A., & Altounjy, R. (2019). The Determinants Factors of an Effective Risk-Aware Culture of Firms in Implementing and Maintaining Risk Management Program. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5), 459–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p459
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Juliano Nunes Alves, Leander Luiz Klein, Ana Paula Brum Zavarise
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must ensure:
- that there is complete consensus among all co-authors to approve the final version of the paper and its submission for publication.
- that their work is original, and if the work and/or words of others have been used, these have been duly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. RCA reserves the right to use software or any other methods of plagiarism detection.
All submissions received for evaluation in the RCA journal are screened for plagiarism and self-plagiarism. Plagiarism identified in manuscripts during the evaluation process will result in the submission being archived. In the event of plagiarism being identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, retract it.
Authors grant RCA exclusive rights of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons (CC BY) 4.0 International License.
Authors are authorized to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (e.g., publishing in an institutional repository, on a personal website, publishing a translation, or as a chapter in a book), with an acknowledgement of its authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This license grants any user the right to:
Share – copy, download, print, or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt – remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
Attribution – You must give appropriate credit (cite and reference), provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
No additional restrictions – You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
