Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Two Conferences Point to a New Core in the Domain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2015v20nesp1p1Keywords:
Ethics in Information Organization, Knowledge Organization-SystemsAbstract
Two conferences called "Ethics in Information Organization (EIO)," held in 2009 and 2013, brought together practitioners and scholars in knowledge organization (KO) to discuss ethical decision-making for the organization of knowledge. Traditionally the notion of ethics as a component of knowledge organization has occupied a sort of background position. Concepts of cultural warrant clash with concepts of literary warrant to produce harmful knowledge organization systems. Here tools of domain analytical visualization are applied to the two EIO conferences to demonstrate the potential intension of ethics for KO. Co-word analysis helps to visualize the thematic core in the most frequently used terms: user, ethical, knowledge, national, description, and access. There clearly is a meta-level trajectory incorporating ethics and the user, while the intension includes all applied approaches to KO as well as strong recognition of national, regional, and social cultural identities. Another approach to domain analysis is to examine the social semantics (by analyzing the public record of discourse through citation patterns). Author co-citation analysis shows work anchored in the basic theoretical premises of KO, but also bringing ideas from outside the domain to bear on the problems of objective violence. A network visualization shows how the work on ethics in KO is based on the core principles of KO, but relies also on evidence from librarianship and philosophical guidance to bring forward the issues surrounding objective violence in KOS. The authors contributing to this small pair of conferences have laid out a pathway for expanding understanding of the role of ethics in KO.
Downloads
References
Beghtol, Clare. 2005. Ethical decision-making for knowledge representation and organization systems for global use,Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56: 903–12.
Beghtol, Clare. 2008. Professional values and ethics in knowledge organization and cataloging.Journal of information ethics17, no. 1: 12–19.
Hjørland, Birger. 2008. Deliberate bias in knowledge organization? In Arsenault, Clément and Joseph T. Tennis, eds. Culture and identity in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Tenth International ISKO Conference, 5-8 August 2008, Montréal, Canada. Advances in Knowledge Organization 11.Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 256-61.
Lee, Hur-Li, ed. 2009. The ethics of information organization. Taylor and Francis. (Also published as Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 47 no. 7).
Mai, Jens-Erik. 2013. Ethics, values and morality in contemporary library classifications. Knowledge organization 40: 242-53.
Olson, Hope A. 1999. Exclusivity, teleology and hierarchy: our Aristotelean legacy. Knowledge organization 26: 65-73.
Ridi, Riccardo. Ethical Values for Knowledge Organization.Knowledge organization 40: 187-96.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2012. Epistemology of Domain analysis. Chapter 6 in Smiraglia, Richard P. and Hur-Li Lee eds.,Cultural frames of knowledge. Würzburg: Ergon, pp. 111-24.
Smiraglia, Richard P. 2013. The Epistemological Dimension of Knowledge Organization.IRIS Revista de Informação, Memória e Tecnologia2 no. 1. Available: http://www.repositorios.ufpe.br/revistas/index.php/IRIS/article/view/498.
Tennis, Joseph T. 2013. Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization: toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization. Knowledge organization 40: 42-49.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2008. Violence. New York: ProfileBooks.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Richard P. Smiraglia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.