Mega-journals and altmetrics: relations between new forms of research publications and evaluations of impact

Authors

  • Milton Shintaku Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT)
  • Janinne Barcelos Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT) Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
  • Ronaldo Araújo Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).
  • Ronnie Fagundes de Brito Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2019v24n54p52

Keywords:

Scientific communication, Scientific communication and internet, Mega-Journals, Altmetrics

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the convergence between mega-journals and altmetrics. It is a theoretical reflection based on bibliographical research that systematizes the correlation regarding the characteristics that involve mega-journals (publication volume, thematic range, flexible peer review, processing rate and limitations of the traditional periodicals) and Altmetrics (support in article selection, post publication review, impact measure, tool types, and limitations of traditional metrics). Altmetrics may be the most suitable metric to verify the effectiveness of mega-journals, because it is aligned with the main characteristics of this dissemination channel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Milton Shintaku, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT)

Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Tecnólogo no Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciências e Tecnologia (Ibict) e Professor da Secretaria de Educação do Distrito Federal (SEDF). 

Janinne Barcelos, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (IBICT) Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Doutoranda em Ciência da Informação na Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Assistente de pesquisa do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict). 

Ronaldo Araújo, Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).

Doutor em Ciência da Informação pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). Professor Adjunto do Curso de Biblioteconomia, na Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL).

Ronnie Fagundes de Brito, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict)

Doutor em Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2012). Tecnologista do Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict).

References

ARAÚJO, Ronaldo. F. de. Mídias sociais e comunicação científica: análise altmétrica em artigos de periódicos da ciência da informação. Em Questão, v. 21, p. 96-109, 2015.

BARJAK, Franz. The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v. 57, n. 10, p. 1350-1367, 2006.

BARROS, Moreno. Altmetrics: métricas alternativas de impacto científico com base em redes sociais. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v.20, n.2, p .19-37, abr./jun. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/1782

CÔRTES, Pedro Luiz. Considerações sobre a evolução da ciência e da comunicação científica. In: POBLACION, Dinah Aguiar; WITTER, Geraldina Porto; SILVA, José Fernando Modesto da. In: XVIII ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO. Anais… ENANCIB 2017 23 a 27 de outubro de 2017 – Marília – SP (Org.). Comunicação e produção científica: contexto, indicadores, avaliação. São Paulo: Angellara, 2006.

BINFIELD, Peter. PLoS ONE and the rise of the Open Access MegaJournal. PLoS Biology, 2011.

BINFIELD, Peter. Novel scholarly journal concepts. In: Opening science. Springer, Cham, 2014. p. 155-163.

BJÖRK, Bo-Christer. Have the “mega-journals” reached the limits to growth?. PeerJ, v. 3, p. e981, 2015.

DOMNINA, T. N. A megajournal as a new type of scientific publication. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, v. 43, n. 4, p. 241-250, 2016.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

HOWARD, Jennifer. Rise of ‘altmetrics’ revives questions about how to measure impact of research. The Chronicle of Higher Education, v. 59, n. 38, p. A6-A7, 2013.

HOYT, Jason; BINFIELD, Peter. Everything Evolves, Even Publishing. Against the Grain, v. 28, n. 1, p. 12, 2016.

HURD, Julie M. The transformation of scientific communication: A model for 2020. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, v. 51, n. 14, p. 1279-1283, 2000.

JONES, Phill. Publishers: applying altmetrics. 2015. Disponível em: <https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/111641> Acesso em: 03 ago. 2018.

MACGREGOR, James; STRANACK, Kevin; WILLINSKY, John. The Public Knowledge Project: Open source tools for open access to scholarly communication. In: Opening science. Springer, Cham, 2014. p. 165-175.

MUELLER, Suzana. A ciência, o sistema de comunicação científica e a literatura científica. In: CAMPELLO, B. S.; CENDON, B. V.; KREMER, J. M. (Orgs). Fontes de informação para pesquisadores e profissionais. Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 2000, p. 21-34.

OLLÉ CASTELLÀ, Candela; LÓPEZ‐BORRULL, Alexandre; ABADAL, Ernest. The challenges facing library and information science journals: editors' opinions. Learned Publishing, v. 29, n. 2, p. 89-94, 2016.

ORLANDI, Ludovico Bullini et al. Scholarly work in the Internet age: Co-evolving technologies, institutions and workflows. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2018.

PRIEM, J.; TARABORELLI, D.; GROTH, P.; NEYLON, C. Altmetrics: a manifesto. London: Altmetric.org, 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 mar. 2017.

SILVA, Edna Lucia; LOPES DE LACERDA TAVARES, Aureliana; SPECK PEREIRA, José Paulo. O estado da arte da pesquisa sobre comunicação científica (1996-2006) realizada no Brasil no âmbito da ciência da informação. Transinformação, v. 22, n. 3, 2010.

SPEZI, Valerie et al. “Let the community decide”? The vision and reality of soundness-only peer review in open-access mega-journals. Journal of Documentation, v. 74, n. 1, p. 137-161, 2018.

SUD, Pardeep; THELWALL, Mike. Evaluating altmetrics. Scientometrics, v. 98, n. 2, p. 1131-1143, 2014.

WAKELING, Simon et al. Open access megajournals: The publisher perspective (Part 2: Operational realities). Learned Publishing, v. 30, n. 4, p. 313-322, 2017.

WANG, Xianwen et al. The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, v.103, n.2, p.555–564, 2015

WARE, Mark; MABE, Michael. The stm report. An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing, 2012.

VANTI, Nadia; SANZ-CASADO, Elías. Altmetria: a métrica social a serviço de uma ciência mais democrática. Transinformação, v. 28, n. 3, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-04

How to Cite

SHINTAKU, Milton; BARCELOS, Janinne; ARAÚJO, Ronaldo; FAGUNDES DE BRITO, Ronnie. Mega-journals and altmetrics: relations between new forms of research publications and evaluations of impact. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 54, p. 52–61, 2019. DOI: 10.5007/1518-2924.2019v24n54p52. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/1518-2924.2019v24n54p52. Acesso em: 11 may. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 24 No. 54 (2019): Data de publicação 28/12/2018

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Milton Shintaku, Janinne Barcelos, Ronaldo Araújo, Ronnie Fagundes de Brito

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author must guarantee that:

  • there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
  • the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.

Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.

All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.

This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.

 

Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Any user has the right to:

  • Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

According to the following terms:

  • Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.