Vol. 19 No. 3 (2020): Dossier Karl-Otto Apel's thought + Continuous Flow

Editorial

Editorial

Vilmar Debona

481-482
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Presentation

Foreword – Dossier The thought of Karl-Otto Apel

Delamar José Volpato Dutra, Alessandro Pinzani

483-486
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Dossier The Thought of Karl-Otto Apel

From formal semantics to transcendental pragmatics: Karl-Otto Apel's original idea

Jürgen Habermas

487-517
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Karl-Otto Apel (1922-2017): two philosophical contributions

Delamar José Volpato Dutra

518-552
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Apel on the origins of moral

Alessandro Pinzani

553-567
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Against the new democratic revisionism: the scope of the moral value of democracy in K.-O. Apel

Domingo García-Marzá

568-591
- PDF/A (Español (España))
Karl-Otto Apel: the transcendental pragmatics as a proposal for a new configuration of philosophy

Manfredo Araújo de Oliveira

592-615
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Karl-Otto Apel’s radical philosophy: co-responsible co-authorship in the face of the anomalies of metaethics

Jovino Pizzi

616-636
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Applying Apel’s discourse ethics: corresponsibility in global climate justice

Milene Consenso Tonetto

637-655
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Apel versus Habermas: the controversial trajectory of the two original variants of discourse ethics

Angelo Vitório Cenci

656-677
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
The debate between Habermas and Apel on discourse ethics: reconsideration of the reasons for the divergence

Marina Velasco

678-697
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
The transformation of philosophy between transcendental reflection and rational reconstruction: on the meaning of a contemporary philosophical confrontation

Luiz Repa

698-718
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Articles - Continuous Flow

Beyond freedom’s right: a republican analysis of the critical democratic theory of A. Honneth

Nicolás Emanuel Olivares

719-740
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben: theoretical convergences and divergences about powers and potencies

Carlos Henrique Aguiar Serra, Luís Antônio Francisco de Souza, Raphael Guazzeli Valerio

741-761
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))
Possible approximations: notes on Álvaro Vieira Pinto’s and Enrique Dussel’s ethics

Breno Augusto da Costa, Adriano Eurípedes Medeiros Martins

762-789
- PDF/A
Metanormativity: solving questions of moral and empirical uncertainty

Nicholas Kluge Corrêa, Nythamar Fernandes de Oliveira

790-810
- PDF/A
Bad humor or bad temper? Two problems in the ethics of humor

João Pinheiro da Silva

811-830
- PDF/A (Português (Brasil))

Editorial

Editorial

Presentation

Foreword – Dossier The thought of Karl-Otto Apel

Dossier The Thought of Karl-Otto Apel

From formal semantics to transcendental pragmatics: Karl-Otto Apel's original idea

Karl-Otto Apel (1922-2017): two philosophical contributions

Apel on the origins of moral

Against the new democratic revisionism: the scope of the moral value of democracy in K.-O. Apel

Karl-Otto Apel: the transcendental pragmatics as a proposal for a new configuration of philosophy

Karl-Otto Apel’s radical philosophy: co-responsible co-authorship in the face of the anomalies of metaethics

Applying Apel’s discourse ethics: corresponsibility in global climate justice

Apel versus Habermas: the controversial trajectory of the two original variants of discourse ethics

The debate between Habermas and Apel on discourse ethics: reconsideration of the reasons for the divergence

The transformation of philosophy between transcendental reflection and rational reconstruction: on the meaning of a contemporary philosophical confrontation

Articles - Continuous Flow

Beyond freedom’s right: a republican analysis of the critical democratic theory of A. Honneth

Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben: theoretical convergences and divergences about powers and potencies

Possible approximations: notes on Álvaro Vieira Pinto’s and Enrique Dussel’s ethics

Metanormativity: solving questions of moral and empirical uncertainty

Bad humor or bad temper? Two problems in the ethics of humor

Make a Submission

Language