Advances and setbacks of labor flexibilization in Argentina. Contributions for a comparison of the historical trajectories of different sectors of activity

Authors

  • Marina Kabat CEHR-IDICHS UNLP-CONICET
  • Ianina Harari IIGG-Conicet
  • Julia Egan UBA-CEICS
  • Rocío Fernández UBA-CEICS
  • Sebastián Cominiello IIGG-Conicet
  • Roberto Muñoz UBA-CEICS
  • Ezequiel Murmis UBA-CEICS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-9222.2014v6n12p273

Keywords:

Argentina, Collective bargaining, labor flexibility

Abstract

Labour flexibility is often associated with the “neoliberal” governments of the last decades of the twentieth century and with the emergence of post-Fordist labour regimes. This view overlooks the fact that the deregulation of labour standards was long sought by the bourgeoisie. The Argentine case illustrates how, since the mid-1950s, legal changes have been promoted that enable greater mobility of the workforce and support wage forms linked to productivity. We analyse collective bargaining in nine branches of production, from 1954 to the present, and study the evolution of clauses relating to labour flexibility present in collective agreements. This historical reconstruction leads us to link these changes with the changing balance of power between social classes.

Published

2014-12-30

How to Cite

KABAT, Marina; HARARI, Ianina; EGAN, Julia; FERNÁNDEZ, Rocío; COMINIELLO, Sebastián; MUÑOZ, Roberto; MURMIS, Ezequiel. Advances and setbacks of labor flexibilization in Argentina. Contributions for a comparison of the historical trajectories of different sectors of activity. Revista Mundos do Trabalho, Florianópolis, v. 6, n. 12, p. 273–297, 2014. DOI: 10.5007/1984-9222.2014v6n12p273. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/mundosdotrabalho/article/view/1984-9222.2014v6n12p273. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.