Estudos da Tradução, tradução audiovisual e recepção
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2026.e107293Palavras-chave:
recepção, complexidade audiovisual, acessibilidade, audiênciaResumo
A recepção de textos traduzidos até agora não recebeu a devida atenção nos Estudos da Tradução, ainda que teorias dos estudos de recepção tenham sido aplicados nas últimas décadas, primeiro na tradução literária e depois em outras áreas e tipos textuais. O presente artigo explora o desenvolvimento dos estudos de recepção nos Estudos da Tradução, com foco em algumas das teorias e metodologias mais significativas. Após isso, o foco volta-se para a tradução audiovisual, momento em que são explorados os conceitos de audiência e recepção. Discute-se, também, outros conceitos adjacentes que influenciam a abordagem e a metodologia da investigação sobre recepção. Por fim, o artigo aborda as oportunidades e os desafios da interdisciplinaridade, que trouxe, está trazendo e pode continuar a trazer avanços para o estudo da recepção da tradução de textos audiovisuais.
Referências
Abdallah, K. (2012). Translators in Production Networks: Reflections on Agency, Quality and Ethics. [PhD thesis]. University of Eastern Finland.
Agost, R., Orero, P., & Di Giovanni, E. (Eds.). (2012). Multidisciplinarity in Audiovisual Translation. MonTi, (4). https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2012.4
Bell, A. (1984). Language Style and Audience Design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X
Bell, A. (1991). The Language of the News Media. Blackwell.
Berman, A. (2009). Toward a Translation Criticism: John Donne (F. Massardier-Kenny, Trans.). The Kent State University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1971). Le marché des biens symboliques. Année Sociologique, 22, 49–126.
Bourdieu, P. (1972). Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Droz.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Brooker, W., & Jermyn, D. (Eds.). (2003). The Audience Studies Reader. Routledge.
Caffrey, C. (2009). Relevant Abuse? Investigating the Effects of an Abusive Subtitling Procedure on the Perception of TV Anime using Eye Tracker and Questionnaire. [PhD thesis]. Dublin City University.
Chaume, F. (2004). Film Studies and Translation Studies: Two Disciplines at Stake in Audiovisual Translation. Meta, 49(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.7202/009016ar
Chesterman, A. (1993). From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’: Laws, Norms and Strategies in Translation Studies. Target, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.02che
Chesterman, A. (1998). Causes, Translations, Effects. Target, 10(2), 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.10.2.02che
Chesterman, A. (2007). Bridge Concepts in Translation Sociology. In M. Wolf & A. Fukari (Eds.), Constructing a Sociology of Translation (pp. 171–183). John Benjamins.
Davison, A., & Green, G. M. (Eds.). (1988). Linguistic Complexity and Text Comprehension: Readability Issues Reconsidered. Lawrence.
De Linde, Z., & Key, N. (1999). The Semiotics of Subtitling. St Jerome.
Di Giovanni, E. (Ed.). (2011). Between Text and Receiver: Translation and Accessibility. Peter Lang.
Even-Zohar, I. (1990). Polysystem Studies. Poetics Today, 11(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772666
Fish, S. (1980). Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Harvard University Press.
Fox, W. (2016). Integrated Titles: An Improved Viewing Experience? In S. Hansen-Schirra & S. Grucza (Eds.), Eye-tracking and Applied Linguistics (pp. 5–30). Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.17169/langsci.b108.230
Gambier, Y. (2002). Les censures dans la traduction audiovisuelle. TTR, 15(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.7202/007485ar
Gambier, Y. (2009). Challenges in Research on Audiovisual Translation. In A. Pym & A. Perekrestenko (Eds.), Translation Research Project 2 (pp. 17–25). Intercultural Studies Group.
Gambier, Y., & van Doorslaer, L. (Eds.) (2016). Border crossings: Translation Studies and Other Disciplines. John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Blackwell.
Grodal, T. (2009). Embodied Vision: Evolution, Emotion, Culture, and Film. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195371314.001.0001
Gutt, E.-A. (2000). Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Blackwell & St Jerome.
Iser, W. (1978). The Art of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. University of Minnesota Press.
Jiménez-Crespo, M. A. (2017). Crowdsourcing and Online Collaborative Translations. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.131
Kovačič, I. (1995). Reception of Subtitles: The Non-existent Ideal Viewer. Translatio, 14(3–4), 376–383.
Kruger, H. (2016). Fluency/Resistancy and Domestication/Foreignization: A Cognitive Perspective. Target, 28(1), 4–41. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.1.01kru
Künzli, A., & Ehrensberger-Dow, M. (2011). Innovative Subtitling: A Reception Study. In C. Alvstad, A. Hild & E. Tiselius (Eds.), Methods and Strategy of Process Research (pp. 187–200). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.14kun
Lavaur, J.-M., & Bairnstow, D. (2011). Languages on the Screen: Is Film Comprehension Related to Viewers’ Fluency and to the Language in the Subtitles? International Journal of Psychology, 46(6), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.565343
Lefevere, A. (2017). Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. Routledge.
Miquel Iriarte, M. (2017). The reception of subtitling for the deaf and hard of hearing. [PhD thesis]. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. https://hdl.handle.net/10803/403811
Nida, E. (1964). Toward a Science of Translating. E. J. Brill.
O’Hagan, M., & Sasamoto, R. (2016). Crazy Japanese Subtitles? Shedding Light on the Impact of Impact Captions with a Focus on Research Methodology. In S. Hansen-Schirra & S. Grucza (Eds.), Eye-tracking and Applied Linguistics (pp. 31–58). Language Science Press. https://doi.org/10.17169/langsci.b108.230
Perego, E. (2016). History, Development, Challenges and Opportunities of Empirical Research in AVT. Across Languages and Cultures, 17(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2016.17.2.1
Romero-Fresco, P. (2015). The Reception of Subtitles for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Europe. Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0888-0
Scott, C. (2012). Translating the Perception of Text: Literary Translation and Phenomenology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315084619
Strowe, A. (2011). Is Simpatico Possible in Translation? The 1620 Translation of the Decameron and the Case for Similarity. The Translator, 17(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2011.10799479
Suojanen, T., Koskinen, K., & Tuominen, T. (Eds.). (2015). User-centered Translation. Routledge.
Taylor, C. (2003). Multimodal Transcription in the Analysis, Translation and Subtitling of Italian Films. The Translator, 9(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2003.10799153
Toury, G. (2012). Descriptive translation studies – and beyond (Rev. ed.). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4
Tuominen, T. (2012). The Art of Accidental Reading and Incidental Listening: An Empirical Study on the Viewing of Subtitled Films. [PhD thesis]. University of Tampere. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-9008-8
Venuti, L. (2008). The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2026 Cadernos de Tradução
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista).
