Theoretical currents of Archival Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2013v18n37p61Keywords:
Archival Science, Epistemology of Archival Science, Theorerical currents of Archival ScienceAbstract
Archival Science was formed, as a scientific discipline, in the late nineteenth century, from the consolidation of a custody and heritage model. In the twentieth century, several theories have been developed, systematized in this article in four axes. As a result, Archival Science has expanded its scope of studies. As a result of this expansion, there are contemporary perspectives with systemic models, covering different types of archives, concerned with the sociocultural context of the archives, and also insering digital technologies in the practice of archives.
Downloads
References
ALBERCH I FUGUERAS, R. et al. Archivos y cultura: manual de dinamización. Gijón: Trea, 2001.
ÁVILA, R. F.; SOUSA, R. T. A aporia dos estudos de comportamento informacional na Arquivística. Cenário Arquivístico, v. 4, n. 1, p. 41-53, jan./jun. 2011.
BLAIS, G.; ENNS, D.; RICHAN, D. Out of the Ivory Tower: public programming in Canadian archives. In: Canadian Archives in 1992. Ottawa: Canadian Council of Archives, 1992, p. 135-156.
BLAYA PEREZ, C.; MENEZES, P. L. O usuário e o direito à informação. Ponto de Acesso, v. 1, n. 2, p. 49-69, jul./dez. 2007.
CASWELL, M. Khmer Rouge archives: accountability, truth, and memory in Cambodia. Archival Science, v. 10, n. 1, p. 25-44, 2010.
COEURÉ, S.; DUCLERT, V. Les archives. Paris: La Découverte, 2001.
COLOMBO, F. Os arquivos imperfeitos: memória social e cultura eletrônica. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1992.
CONWAY, P. Facts and frameworks: an approach to studying users and archives. American Archivist, v. 49, P. 393-407, 1986.
COOK, T. What is past is prologue: a history of archival ideas since 1898, and the future paradigm shift. Archivaria, v. 43, p. 17-63, 1997.
COUTURE, C. et al. Les fonctions de l’archivistique contemporaine. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec, 1999.
COX, R. Personal archives and a new archival calling: readings, reflections and ruminations. Duluth: Litwin, 2008.
DELGADO GÓMEZ, A.; CRUZ MUNDET, J.R. El archivo como construcción social. Candelaria: Asarca, 2010.
DELSALLE, P. Une histoire de l'archivistique. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec, 2000.
DOLLAR, C. Archival theory and information technologies: The impact of information technologies on archival principles and methods. Macerata: University of Macerata, 1992.
DOOLEY, J. Subject indexing in context. American Archivist, v. 55, p. 344-354, 1992.
DOWLER, L. The role of use in defining archival practice and principles: a research agenda for avaialbility and use of records. American Archivist, v. 51, p. 74-95, 1988.
DUCHEIN, M. Obstacles to the access, use and transfer of information from archives: a RAMP study. Paris: Unesco – General Information Programm; Unisist, 1983.
DURANTI, L. Diplomatics: new uses for an old science. Archivaria, v. 28, p. 6-24, 1989.
DURANTI, L.; EASTWOOD, T.. Protecting eletronic evidence: a progress report on a research study and its methodology. Archivi & computer, v. 3, p. 213-250, 1995.
FONSECA, M. O. Arquivologia e ciência da informação. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. FGV, 2005.
GARCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, A. Uma outra memoria é possível. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2008.
HARRIS, V. Archives and justice: a South African perspective. Society of American Archivists, 2007.
JARDIM, J. M. Sistemas e políticas públicas de arquivos no Brasil. Niterói: EdUff, 1995.
JARDIM, J.M., FONSECA, M.O. Estudos de usuários em arquivos: em busca de um estado da arte. Datagramazero, v. 5, n. 5, out. 2004.
JARDIM, J. M.; FONSECA, M. O. (orgs). A formação do arquivista no Brasil. Niterói: EdUff, 1999.
JIMERSON, R. (Ed.). American archival studies: readings in theory and practice. Chicago: The Society of American Archivists, 2000.
JIMERSON, R. Redefining archival identity: meeting user needs in the information society. American Archivist, v. 52, p. 332-340, 1989.
KOLSRUD, O. The Evolution of Basic Appraisal Principles- Some Comparative Observations. American Archivist, v. 55, p. 26-39, 1992.
LOPES, L. C. A nova arquivística na modernização administrativa. Rio de Janeiro: Papéis e Sistemas, 2000.
MATTAR, E. (org). Acesso à informação e política de arquivos. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2003.
MONTGOMERY, B. Archiving human rights: the records of amnesty international, USA. Archivaria, v. 39, p. 108-131, 1995.
PINKETT, H. American archival theory: the state of the art. American Archivist, v. 44, n. 3. p. 217-222, 1981.
PUGH, M. J. The illusion of omniscience: subject access and the reference archivist. American Archivist, v. 45, 1982, p. 33-44.
RIBEIRO, F. O acesso à informação nos arquivos. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian; MCT; MCEC, 2003.
SCHELLENBERG, T. Arquivos modernos: princípios e técnicas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV, 1973.
SCHWARTZ, J.; COOK, T. Archives, records and power: the making of modern memory. Archival Science, v. 2, p. 1-19, 2002.
SILVA, A. M. et al. Arquivística: teoria e prática de uma ciência da informação. Porto: Afrontamento, 1998.
SILVA, D. A. Arquivos: uma abordagem inicial sobre o termo “usuário”. Cenário Arquivístico, v. 4, n. 1, p. 9-21, jan./jun. 2011.
SILVA, E. P. A trajetória da arquivologia: três visões sobre os arquivos. In: III Congresso Nacional de Arquivologia. Rio de Janeiro: Executiva Nacional das Associações Regionais de Arquivologia, 2008.
SOUSA, R. Classificação. In: SANTOS, V.; INNARELLI, H.; SOUSA, R. Arquivística: temas contemporâneos. São Paulo: Senac, 2007.
TANODI, A. Manual de archivología hispanoamericana: teorias y principios. Córdoba: Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, 1961.
THOMASSEN, T. Uma primeira introdução à arquivologia. Arquivo & Administração, Rio de Janeiro, v. 5, n. 1, p. 5-16, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Carlos Alberto Ávila Araújo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
As obras deste periódico estão licenciadas com 