Filosofia regressiva: uma alternativa para o ensino de filosofia ?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/%25xAbstract
This article hopes to bring some contributions to the debate concerning trends followed by pedagogical books as well as to the understanding of philosophy as a human construction forged in the argumentative realm. The reference for the discussion was a research with twenty philosophy teaching books. From the results the article presents some arguments about two basic teaching proposals: one centered on specific themes and the other centered on authors. In a second moment, it discusses Chaim Perelman´s regressive philosophy as an alternative to the dogmatic philosophical systems. Finally, back to philosophy teaching the article argues how to make this teaching more attractive or more efficient in order to persuade a determined audience, in this case the students of secondary school.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides open access to all of it content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project, which has designed this system to improve the scholarly and public quality of research, and which freely distributes the journal system as well as other software to support the open access publishing of scholarly resources. The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
The Perspectiva allow the author(s) yo hold the copyright without restrictions as well as publishing rights. If the paper will be republished later in another format, the author(s) should inform that it has originally been published as article in Perspectiva Journal and quote the complete references.