Analysis and correspondence between the entities of Europeana Data Model, IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME conceptual models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2023.e92822Keywords:
Europeana Data Model, BIBFRAME, IFLA LRM, Cataloguing, MetadataAbstract
Objective: To propose the harmonization between the EDM, BIBFRAME, and IFLA LRM models with the purpose of analyzing the equivalence of entities to enable the interoperability between systems that use these conceptual models as a basis.
Method: This research is characterized as exploratory and descriptive with a qualitative approach, in which a bibliographic survey was used to identify the studies already carried out on the topic. In addition, the analysis of entities was based on the methodology substantiated by Pierre et al. (1999), Taniguchi (2018), Arakaki (2019), and Carrasco (2019).
Results: From the analysis of the models, six ontological categories of entities were identified: (i) Intellectual Content, (ii) Subject, (iii) Concrete Unit, (iv) Agent, (v) Space-time, and (vi) Reification. Consistent equivalences were observed between the entities, their functionalities, and terminology in most categories, except for the entities of the Intellectual Content category and the structuring of the Concrete Unit category.
Conclusions: It was concluded that the most notable difference between the models was expressed in the Intellectual Content category, and that, because they are based on the cataloging tradition, the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models have functionally equivalent entities, while the EDM model, focused on the cultural heritage object itself, does not have any entity that may be mapped in this category. Likewise, a structural difference was found in the Concrete Unit category, in which the EDM model makes a distinction between the object itself and its digital representation, whereas such a distinction occurs in the Intellectual Content category for the IFLA LRM and BIBFRAME models.
Downloads
References
ARAKAKI, A. C. S. O modelo IFLA Library Reference Model e o linked data. Informação & Informação, v. 25, n. 3, p. 163-186, 2020. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2020v25n3p163. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
ARAKAKI, F. A. Metadados administrativos e a proveniência dos dados: modelo baseado na família PROV. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília. 2019. Disponível em: https://repositorio.unesp.br/bitstream/handle/11449/180490/arakaki_fa_dr_mar.pdf?sequence=5&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
CARRASCO, L. B. Integração de conteúdos culturais heterogêneos em ambientes digitais do patrimônio cultural: harmonização de modelos conceituais. 2019. 146 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília. 2019. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/182113. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
COYLE, K. FRBR, before and after: a look at our bibliographic models. Chicago: American Library Association, 2016.
EUROPEANA. Definition of the Europeana Data Model v5.2.8. [S.l.]: EDM, 2017. Disponível em: https://pro.Europeana.eu/files/Europeana_Professional/Share_your_data/Techni
cal_requirements/EDM_Documentation//EDM_Definition_v5.2.8_102017.pdf.
Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
FUSCO, E. Modelos conceituais de dados como parte do processo da catalogação: perspectiva de uso dos FRBR no desenvolvimento de catálogos bibliográficos digitais. 2010. 249 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Marília. 2010. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/103369. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. Bibliographic Framework as a web of data: linked data model and supporting services. Washington, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/pdf/marcld-report-11-21-2012.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS. Overview of the BIBFRAME 2.0 Model. Washington, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.loc.gov/bibframe/docs/bibframe2-model.html. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
MARCONDES, C. H. Interoperabilidade entre acervos digitais de arquivos, bibliotecas e museus: potencialidades das tecnologias de dados abertos interligados. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 21, n. 2, p. 61-83, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/2735. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2022.
OLIVEIRA, R. H. A.; CASTRO, F. F. de. Contribuições do IFLA LRM para o RDA: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends, [S. l.], v. 16, p. e02156, 2022. DOI: 10.36311/1981-1640.2022.v16.e02156. Disponível em: https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/13187. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
PATRÍCIO, H. S. A. Europeana e a agregação de metadados na web: análise dos esquemas ESE/EDM e da aplicação de standards da web semântica a dados de bibliotecas. Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal, Lisboa, 2012. Disponível em: https://purl.pt/resources/apresentacoes/1_2012_A%20Europeana%20e%20a%20agregacao%20de%20metadados%20na%20web_hpatricio.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
PIERRE, M. St.; PAUL, S. K.; SIMMONDS, A.; LAPLANTE, B. We used to call it publishing: Issues in crosswalking content metadata standards. Against the Grain, v. 11, n. 4, p. 74-76, 1999.
ROBINSON, S. et al. Conceptual modelling for discrete-event simulation. CRC Press Inc. 2010.
RIBEIRO, C. J. S.; SOUSA, A. M. C. de; BORGES, M. M. Proposta de integração de recursos do patrimônio cultural científico no modelo EDM: uma perspectiva de representação de um domínio temático. BIBLOS, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 2, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14295/biblos.v34i2.11864. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
RIVA, P.; LE BOUEF, P.; ŽUMER, M. IFLA Library Reference Model: um modelo conceitual para a Informação Bibliográfica. [s. l.], p. 106, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/cataloguing/frbr-lrm/ifla-lrm-august-2017_rev201712-por.pdf. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
SEIKEL, M.; STEELE, T. Comparison of Key Entities Within Bibliographic Conceptual Models and Implementations: Definitions, Evolutions, and Relationships. Library Resources & Technical Services, [s. l.], v. 64, n. 2, p. 62-71, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.64n2.62. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
SILVA, L. C.; SEGUNDO, J. E. S.; FREIRE, N. Web semântica na Europeana: uma abordagem do padrão EDM. Biblios (Peru), n. 80, p. 15-26, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2020.759. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
SILVA, S. L. N. Mapeamento entre padrões de metadados: um estudo do Dublin Core e do BIBFRAME. 2022. 59 f. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Bacharelado em Biblioteconomia) - Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2022. Disponível em: https://bdm.unb.br/handle/10483/31558. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
TANIGUCHI, S. Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. [s. l.], v. 56, n. 5/6, p. 427-454, dez. 2018.
TEIXEIRA, L. M. D. Conceitualização na construção de ontologias: relações semânticas no âmbito do Blood Project. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Informação) - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte,
Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/1843/ECID-82AGNQ. Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
TRIQUES, M. L.; ARAKAKI, A. C. S. Representação de patrimônios culturais em plataformas digitais: o modelo de dados da Europeana. Em Questão, Porto Alegre, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245271.185-209 Acesso em: 18 jan. 2023.
ŽUMER, M. IFLA Library Reference Model (IFLA LRM) - Harmonisation of the FRBR family. Knowledge Organization, v. 45, n. 4, p.310-318, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.nomos-elibrary.de/10.5771/0943-7444-2018-4-310/ifla-library-reference-model-ifla-lrm-harmonisation-of-the-frbr-family-jahrgang-45-2018-heft-4?page=1. Acesso em: 10 maio 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rhuan Henrique Alves de Oliveira, Luana Carolina de Castro Gil, Ana Carolina Simionato Arakaki, Fabiano Ferreira de Castro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.