Reflections from the bibliometric analysis about documents types, information flows and documents evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2017v22n50p59Keywords:
Documentary types, Information flows, Appraisal, Records managementAbstract
Investigating interrelated elements that can bring advantages to organizations is essential, especially, given the new demands of records management in these environments. The citations are analyzed in articles from periodicals of the Information Science area, from the following keywords: documentary types, information flows and appraisal, to observe which researchers have developed investigations about these themes, seeking to evidence if the texts present relationship between the three themes mentioned above. As far as methodological procedures are concerned, the research is descriptive-exploratory, of a qualitative and quantitative nature. From this perspective, the bibliometric analysis was applied, more specifically the citation analysis of 28 (twenty-eight) selected articles, contemplating 489 (four hundred and eighty-nine) citations. It was observed that only 73 (seventy-three) researchers investigate the thematic mentioned above, of which only four (4) establish relationship between them. Highlights the importance of studies to investigate and reflect on this interrelationship and impact of this for business organizations.
Downloads
References
ARQUIVO NACIONAL (BRASIL). Conselho Nacional de Arquivos Classificação, temporalidade e destinação de documentos de arquivo: relativos às atividades-meio da administração pública/Arquivo Nacional. Rio de Janeiro: Arquivo Nacional, 2001.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 15489-1: Information and Documentation. Records Management. Concepts and principles. Genebra, 2016.
ASOCIACIÓN Española de Normalización y Certificación. UNE-ISO 30301: 2011. Información y documentación. Sistemas de gestión para los documentos. Requisitos. Madrid, AENOR, 2011.
BELLOTTO, H. L. Arquivo: estudos e reflexões. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 2014.
BERNARDES, I. P. Como avaliar documentos de arquivo. São Paulo: Arquivo do Estado, 1998.
CAMARGO, A. M. de A.; BELLOTTO, H. L. (Coord.). Dicionário de terminologia arquivística. São Paulo: AAB-SP/Secretaria de Estado de Cultura, 1996.
CASTELLS, M. O espaço de fluxos. In: ________. A sociedade em rede. 6.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 2001. v.1; Cap.6; p.467-521
CERMEÑO MARTORELL, LL.; RIVAS PALÁ, E. Valorar y seleccionar documentos. Quées y cómo se hace. Gijón: Trea; 2010.
CHIAVENATO, I. Introdução à teoria geral da administração: uma visão abrangente da moderna administração das organizações. 7.ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2003.
HEREDIA HERRERA, A. Lenguaje y vocabulário archivísticos. Algo más que un diccionario. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía. Consejería de Cultura; 2011.
HERNÁNDEZ OLIVERA, L.; MORO CABERO, M. Procedimientos de valoración documental. Salamanca: ACAL, 2002.
MONTEIRO, N. A.; VALENTIM, M. L. P. Necessidades informacionais e aprendizagem no ciclo de vida de um projeto. Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Campinas (SP), v.5, p.53-66, 2008.
RODRIGUES, A. C. Diplomática contemporânea como fundamento metodológico da identificação de tipologia documental em arquivos. São Paulo: USP, 2008. 258f. Tese (Doutorado) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em História Social – Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas – Universidade de São Paulo (USP).
SCHELLENBERG, T. R. Avaliação dos Documentos Públicos Modernos. In: ________. Arquivos Modernos: princípios e técnicas. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2006.
VALENTIM, M. L. P. Ambientes e fluxos de informação. In: ________ (Org.). Ambientes e fluxos de informação. São Paulo: Polis: Cultura Acadêmica, 2010. p.13-22.
VILLARDEFRANCOS ÁLVAREZ, M. del C. La identificación de flujos de información: una herramienta obligada para lagestión de información. In: CONGRESOINTERNACIONAL DE INFORMACIÓN (Info'2002), La Habana, Memoria… Cuba: Biomundi: IDICT, 2002.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Natália Marinho do Nascimento, Marta Lígia Pomim Valentim, María Manuela Moro Cabero
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
As obras deste periódico estão licenciadas com 