Transition, border plasticity and scientific identity: presence and conceptual fluidity of a disciplinary field in expansion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e75448Keywords:
Transience, Research Groups, Productivity Fellows, Symbolic Exchanges, ConceptsAbstract
Objective: By highlighting the primary identity of the agents which are inserted on the Information Science’s disciplinary field, this study investigates the participation and the transitory movement of the productivity fellows in Information Science, which are related to the PQ’s category, between 2001 and 2017, considering research groups which are registered on the CNPQ’s database.
Methods: The research does an exploratory search for information concerning the object of study. With that is possible to understand elements related or consequent to it. The materialist dialectic helps in the sociological perception of the proposed object of study and in the unveiling of the movements involved in it. For the analysis of the presence and transitory movements, investigates: 83 PQ scholarship holders; 133 research groups registered in the Research Groups Directory in Brazil; 233 lines of research; 5 major areas of knowledge and 16 areas of knowledge. In relation to the 233 lines of research, it carries out a conceptual treatment in order to apprehend the research themes carried out in these groups and lines of research.
Results: It is possible to understand that are movements within the same large area of knowledge (endogenous) and in other large areas (exogenous). It checks exogenous movements in 14 of the 83 PQ scholarships in Information Science in the following Major Areas of Knowledge: Health Sciences; Exact and Earth Sciences; Human Sciences; Linguistics, Letters and Arts. It assesses endogenous transient movements in 13 of the 83 PQ fellows selected for the study in the areas of Administration, Communication, Economics, Museology, Urban and Regional Planning, and Social Work. The conceptual lexicon of the CI was verified and perceived in the records of the two movements analyzed.
Conclusions: The presence and transitory movement are set as a system of symbolical exchanges, which promotes the expansion of the evolved disciplinary fields. PQ scholarship holders in CI keep this regime pulsating. They are sensitive and insistent researchers in the search, adaptation and promotion of new knowledge.
Downloads
References
BARROS, J. D’A. Os conceitos: seus usos nas ciências humanas. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2016.
BOURDIEU, P. O campo científico. In: ORTIZ, R. (Org.). Pierre Bourdieu: sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1983a. cap. 4, p. 122-155.
BUFREM, L. S. A prática da pesquisa e os quadros teóricos concorrentes no campo de produção científica em Ciência da Informação. P2P & Inovação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, p. 35-58, set./fev., 2018. Disponível em: http://revista.ibict.br/p2p/article/view/3983/3314. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2019.
BUFREM, L. S.; FREITAS, J. L. Interdomínios na literatura periódica científica da Ciência da Informação. Datagramazero, v. 16, n. 3, ago., 2015. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.inf.br/index.php/article/download/50746. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2019.
COELHO NETTO, J. T. Semiótica, informação e comunicação. 7 ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2014.
GIDDENS, A.; SUTTON, P. W. Conceitos essenciais da Sociologia. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2017.
GREIMAS, A. J. Semiótica e ciências sociais. São Paulo: Cultrix, 1981.
OLIVEIRA, E. F. T. Estudos métricos da informação no Brasil: indicadores de produção, colaboração, impacto e visibilidade. Marília: Oficina Universitária; São Paulo: Cultura Acadêmica, 2018.
SAUSSURE, F. Linguística da língua e linguística da fala. In: In: BALLY, C.; SECHEHAYE, A.; RIEDLINGER, A. (Org.). Curso de linguística geral. 27 ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006. cap. 4, p. 26-28.
SHINN, T. Regimes de produção e difusão de ciência: rumo a uma organização transversal do conhecimento. Scientiae Studia, São Paulo, v.6, n.1, p. 11-42, 2008b. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-31662008000100002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt.Acesso em: 5 dez 2018.
SHINN, T.; RAGOUET, P. Controvérsias sobre a ciência: por uma sociologia transversalista da atividade científica. São Paulo: Associação Filosófica Scientiae Studia: Editora 34, 2008.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Willian Lima Melo, Leilah Santiago Bufrem, Anna Elizabeth Galvão Coutinho Correia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.