Research data management infrastructure and services: an assessment within the scope of São Paulo State University (Unesp)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2022.e85188Keywords:
Research Data, Research Data Management, Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation, RISEAbstract
Objective: Understand the process of infrastructure self-assessment and the provision of research data management services, through the diagnosis of the São Paulo State University, using the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation Framework.
Methods: Exploratory, applied and qualitative research, which consisted of the self-assessment carried out at the São Paulo State University, using the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation, generating a spider chart, in order to assess the infrastructure and the offer of services of research data management. Data collection consisted of applying the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation, resulting in the mapping of research data management practices in the Institution.
Results: Based on the mapping, it was possible to analyze the strengths and needs to improve the infrastructure to support research data management at São Paulo State University, enabling the Institution to verify aspects that require investments, in order to improve the infrastructure and support services for researchers.
Conclusions: Starting from the self-assessment and analysis of aspects related to research data management, it was possible to identify the points highlighted, among which institutional attention to policies stands out, which, although general, can be applied to research data management. However, for the infrastructure and research data management services to be properly structured, it is necessary to have a global look by São Paulo State University for all aspects that make up the management of research data, as structured in the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation model and through the As a result of self-assessment, invest in filling existing gaps and remedying them for the benefit of the researcher, their research results, the scientific community, society and the institution itself.
Downloads
References
AKERS, K. G.; DOTY, J. Research data management practices and perspectives: Differences among the arts and humanities, social sciences, medical sciences, and basic sciences. International Journal of Digital Curation, v. 8, n. 2, p. 5-26, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v8i2.263. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2020.
BHIDE, A. Como os empreendedores constroem estratégias que dão certo. In: Harvard Business Review. Empreendedorismo e estratégia. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2002.
BRASIL. Lei nº 13.709, de 14 de agosto de 2018. Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD). Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 15 ago. 2018. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2018/lei/L13709.htm. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2020.
BRASIL. Lei nº 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998. Altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília, DF, 20 fev. 1998. Seção 1. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L9610.htm. Acesso em: 17 nov. 2020.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprovar as seguintes diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2020.
BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde. Resolução nº 510, de 07 de abril de 2016. Esta Resolução dispõe sobre as normas aplicáveis a pesquisas em Ciências Humanas e Sociais cujos procedimentos metodológicos envolvam a utilização de dados diretamente obtidos com os participantes ou de informações identificáveis ou que possam acarretar riscos maiores do que os existentes na vida cotidiana, na forma definida nesta Resolução. Disponível em: https://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/22917581. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2020.
HEDSTROM, M. Digital preservation: a time bomb for digital libraries. Computers and the Humanities, Michigan, U.S.A, n. 31, p. 189–202, 1998. Disponível em: http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/42573/?sequence=1. Acesso em: 28 nov. 2020.
FAPESP. Gestão de Dados. Disponível em: https://fapesp.br/gestaodedados. Acesso em: 23 nov. 2020.
GILLILAND, A. J. Setting the stage. In: BACA, M. (ed.). Introduction to metadata. Los Angeles: Getty, 2008. p. 1-19. Disponível em: https://www.getty.edu/publications/intrometadata/setting-the-stage/. Acesso em: 19 nov. 2020.
HIGMAN, R.; BANGERT, D.; JONES, S. Three camps, one destination: the intersections of research data management, FAIR and Open. Insights, v. 32, n. 1, p. 18. 2019. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.468. Disponível em: https://insights.uksg.org/articles/10.1629/uksg.468/#. Acesso em: 19 nov. 2020.
JONES, S. et al. Data management planning: How requirements and solutions are beginning to converge. Data Intelligence, v. 2, n. 1-2, p. 208-219, 2020. Disponível em: Disponível em: http://www.data-intelligence-journal.org/p/49/ Acesso em 20 nov. 2020.
MÁRDERO ARELLANO, M. Á. Preservação de documentos digitais. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, DF, v. 33, n. 2, p. 15-27, maio/ago. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.ufpr.br/download.php?dd0=9026. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2020.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264034020-en-fr. Acesso em: 14 nov. 2020.
RANS, J. WHYTE, A. Using RISE the Research Infrastructure Self-Evaluation Framework. 2017. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Disponível em: www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/how-guides. Acesso: 30 nov. 2020.
SALES, L.; SAYÃO, L. F. Uma proposta de taxonomia para dados de pesquisa. Conhecimento em Ação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 1, jan./jun. 2019. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rca/article/view/26337. Acesso em: 23 out. 2020.
SANTOS, E. A.; SILVA, C. E. Os modelos de plano de negócios e sua relevância para sustentabilidade das micro e pequenas empresas. Revista Brasileira de Administração Científica, Aquidabã, v.3, n.1, p.37‐62, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carlos_Silva43/publication/233747518_Os_modelos_de_plano_de_negocios_e_sua_relevancia_para_sustentabilidade_das_micro_e_pequenas_empresas/links/5918bbd6aca27200fe52f207/Os-modelos-de-plano-de-negocios-e-sua-relevancia-para-sustentabilidade-das-micro-e-pequenas-empresas.pdf. Acesso em 30 nov. 2020.
SAYÃO, L. F. Uma outra face dos metadados: informações para a gestão da preservação digital. Encontros Bibli: Revista Eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Florianópolis, v. 15, n. 30, p. 1-31, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.ufpr.br/download.php?dd0=12621. Acesso em: 18 nov. 2020.
SAYÃO, L. F.; SALES, L. Guia de gestão de dados de pesquisa para bibliotecários e pesquisadores. Rio de Janeiro: CNEN/IEN, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.aben.com.br/Arquivos/420/420.pdf. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
SPARC Europe. Evaluate your RDM Offering. Disponível em: https://sparceurope.org/evaluate-your-rdm-offering/ Acesso: 30 nov. 2020.
STRASSER, C; COOK, R.; MICHENER, W.; BUDDEN, A. Primer on data management: what you always wanted to know. California: CDL, 2012. Disponível em: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7tf5q7n3#page-1. Acesso em: 29 out. 2020.
TORINO, E.; ROA-MARTINEZ, S. M.; VIDOTTI, S. A. B. G. Dados de pesquisa: disponibilização ou publicação? In: SHINTAKU, Milton; SALES, Luana Farias; COSTA, Michelli (org.). Tópicos sobre dados abertos para editores científicos. Botucatu, SP: ABEC, 2020. p. 183-201. Disponível em: http://200.19.73.81:8080/jspui/handle/1/4725. Acesso em: 23 out. 2020.
WHYTE, A.; TEDDS, J. Making the case for research data management. DCC Briefing Papers. Edinburgh: Digital Curation Centre. Disponível em: https://www.dcc.ac.uk/guidance/briefing-papers/making-case-rdm. Acesso em: 15 nov. 2020.
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Emanuelle Torino, Jean Fernandes Brito, Gustavo Lunardelli Trevisan, Silvana Aparecida Borsetti Gregorio Vidotti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The author must guarantee that:
- there is full consensus among all the coauthors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
- the work is original, and when the work and/or words from other people were used, they were properly acknowledged.
Plagiarism in all of its forms constitutes an unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable. Encontros Bibli has the right to use software or any other method of plagiarism detection.
All manuscripts submitted to Encontros Bibli go through plagiarism and self-plagiarism identification. Plagiarism identified during the evaluation process will result in the filing of the submission. In case plagiarism is identified in a manuscript published in the journal, the Editor-in-Chief will conduct a preliminary investigation and, if necessary, will make a retraction.
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Source movement, provides full open access to its content. By doing this, the authors keep all of their rights allowing Encontros Bibli to publish and make its articles available to the whole community.
Encontros Bibli content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Any user has the right to:
- Share - copy, download, print or redistribute the material in any medium or format.
- Adapt - remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
According to the following terms:
- Attribution - You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.