A methodological proposal integrating the translation process into the study of cognitive effort

Diana Lorena  Giraldo Ospina; Monica Naranjo Ruiz; Lina Clemencia Romero Ramírez

doi:10.5007/2175-7968.2022.e84845

Autor/innen

Diana Lorena Giraldo Ospina Universidad Autónoma de Manizales
Monica Naranjo Ruiz Universidad Autónoma de Manizales
Lina Clemencia Romero Ramírez Universidad Autónoma de Manizales

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7968.2022.e84845

Schlagworte:

Translator Process, Cognitive Effort, Translog, Semantic content analysis, Triangulation

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological proposal that integrates the translation process into studying the cognitive effort with the use of three instruments. Data triangulation accounts for such phenomena. Translation process research has used Translog to approach mental activities, such as cognitive effort. However, authors such as O’Brien (2006) suggest the use of complementary methods to have a comprehensive understanding of what occurs while translating. This paper aims to present a data collection model that includes the use of Translog as the main instrument to record the indicators of cognitive effort (time and typing pauses) during a translation process, a screen capture software that records the screen’s output, as well as retrospective interview to obtain verbal information from its users. In order to establish a relationship between cognitive effort and the translation process, a triangulation data method was used with the information collected from the aforementioned instruments, alongside conducting a semantic content analysis.

Literaturhinweise

Alves, Fabio. “Cognitive effort and contextual effect in translation: a relevance theoretic approach”. In: International Symposium On New Horizons In Theoretical Translation Studies, Hong Kong, 2007. Proceedings […]. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2007. p. 1-12.

Alves, Fabio; Pagano, Adriana & Da Silva, Igor. “Towards an Investigation of Reading Modalities in/for Translation: An Exploratory Study Using Eye-Tracking Data”. In: O’Brien, Sharon (Ed.). Continuum Studies in Translation. Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum International Publishing, 2011. p. 175-196.

Bacic, Dinko. The Role of Cognitive Effort in Decision Performance Using Data Representations: A Cognitive Fit Perspective. 2014. Dissertation (PhD in Business Administration) – Department of Computer Information Sciences, College of Graduate Studies, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, 2014.

Balling, Laura Winther; Hvelplund, Kristian Tangsgaard & Sjørup, Annette C. “Evidence of parallel processing during translation”. Meta, LIX(2), p. 234-259, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1027474ar

Bell, Roget T. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London & New York: Longman, 1991.

Carl, Michael. Translog-II: A Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Translation Process Research. 2012. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 8., 2012, LREC, Istanbul, Turkey.

Chieh-Ying Chang, Vincent. Testing Applicability of Eye-tracking and fMRI to Translation and Interpreting Studies: An Investigation into Directionality. 2009. Thesis (Ph.D.) – University of London, Imperial College, London, 2009.

Chieh-Ying Chang, Vincent. “Translation Directionality and the Revised Hierarchical Model: An Eye-Tracking Study”. In: O’Brien, Sharon (Ed.). Continuum Studies in Translation. Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum International Publishing, 2011. p. 154-174.

Cooper-Martin, Elizabeth. “Measures of cognitive effort”. Marketing Letters, 5(1), p. 43-56, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993957

Dragsted, Barbara. Segmentation in Translation and Translation Memory Systems: An empirical investigation of cognitive segmentation and effects of integrating a TM system into the translation process. København: Samfundslitteratur, 2004. (Ph.d. Series; No. 5; Vol. 2004).

Dragsted, Barbara & Carl, Michael. “Towards a Classification of Translation Styles based on Eye-tracking and Keylogging Data”. Journal of the Writing Research, 5(1), p. 133-158, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2013.05.01.6

Gile, Daniel. Basic concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1995.

Grinell, Richard; Williams, Margareth & Unrau, Yvonne A. Research Methods for BSW Students. 8. ed. Kalamazoo, MI: Pair Bond Publications, 2009.

Gutt, Ernst-August. Translation and relevance: Cognition and context. Oxford, England: St. Jerome, 1991.

Hansen, Gyde. “Controlling the process: Theoretical and methodological reflections on research into translation processes”. In: Alves, Fabio (Ed.). Triangulating Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2003. p. 25-42.

Hurtado, Amparo. Traducción y Traductología. Introducción a la Traductología. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2007.

Hurtado, Amparo. Traducción y Traductología. Introducción a la Traductología. 5. ed. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra, 2011.

Hurtado, Amparo & Alves, Fabio. “Translation as a cognitive activity”. In: Munday, Jeremy (Ed.). The Routledge Companion to Translation Studies. London: Routledge, 2009. p. 54-73.

Hvelplund, Kristian Tangsgaard. Allocation of cognitive resources in translation: An eyetracking and key-logging study. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School, 2011. (PhD Series; No. 10.2011)

Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke. “Translation Drafting by Professional Translators and by Translation Students”. In: Hansen, Gyde (Ed.). Empirical Translation Studies: Process and Product. Copenhagen Studies in Language 27. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 2002. p. 191-204.

Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke & Schou, Lasse. “Translog Documentation.” In: Hansen, Gyde (Ed.). Probing the process in translation: methods and results. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 1999. p. 9-20.

Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke. & Jensen, Kristian T. H. “Eye movement behaviour across four different types of reading task”. In: Göpferich, Susanne; Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke & Mees, Inger (Eds.). Looking at Eyes: Eye-tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Copenhagen Studies in Language 36. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur, 2008. p. 103-124.

Kiraly, Donald C. Pathways to Translation: Pedagogy and Process. Kent: Kent State University Press, 1995.

Krippendorf, Klaus. Metodología de análisis de contenido. Teoría y práctica. Barcelona, Paidós Comunicación, 1997.

Kurz, Ingrid. Simultandolmetschen als Gegenstand der interdisziplinären Forschung. Vienna, Austria: WUV Universitätsverlag, 1996.

Lörscher, Wolfgang. Translation performance, translation process, and translation strategies: A psycholinguistic investigation. Tübingen, Germany: Narr, 1991.

Mertens, Donna M. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. 3. ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2010.

Mossop, Brian. “The workplace procedures of professional translators”. In: Chesterman, Andrew; Gallardo San Salvador, Natividad & Gambier, Yves (Ed.). Translation in Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1998. p. 39-48.

Naranjo, Mónica; Guzzo, Kevin; Restrepo, Francia & Suárez, Mercedes. “Análisis de la metáfora: Un estudio en áreas cerebrales con potenciales evocados cognitivos”. Forma y Función, 25(1), p. 113-128, 2012.

O’Brien, Sharon. “Pauses as indicators of cognitive effort in post-editing machine translation output”. Across Languages and Cultures, 7(1), p. 1-21, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.7.2006.1.1

Olive, Thierry; Favart, Monik; Beauvais, Caroline & Beauvais, Lucie. “Children’s cognitive effort and fluency in writing: effects and genre and of handwriting automatization”. Learning and Instruction, 19(4), p. 299-308, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.005

Pavlović, Nataša & Jensen, Kristian Tangsgaard. “Eye tracking translation directionality”. In: Pym, Anthony & Perekrestenko, Alexander (Ed.). Translation Research Projects. Tarragona: Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 2009. p. 93-109.

Pezza Cintrão, Heloísa. “Development of Translation Competence in Novices: a Corpus Design and Key-Logging Analysis”. In: O’Brien, Sharon (Ed.). Continuum Studies in Translation. Cognitive Explorations of Translation. London: Continuum International Publishing, 2011. p. 86-107.

Risku, Hanna. Translationsmanagement. Interkulturelle Fachkommunikation im Kommunikationszeitalter. Tübingen: Narr, 2004.

Russo, J. Edward & Dosher Barbara A. “Strategies for multiattribute binary choice”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9(4), p. 676-696, 1983. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0278-7393.9.4.676

Schilperoord, Joost. It’s about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1996.

Sherman, Elisabeth M. S. & Brooks, Brian L. (Ed.). Pediatric Forensic Neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Shreve, Gregory M.; Schaeffner, Christina G. E.; Danks, Joseph & Griffin, Jennifer. “Is there a special kind of ‘reading’ for translation? An empirical investigation of reading in the translation process”. Target, 5(1), p. 21-41, 1993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.03shr

Shreve, Gregory M. & Geoffrey S., Koby. “What’s in the ‘Black Box’? Cognitive science and translation studies”. In: Danks, Joseph; Shreve, Gregory M.; Fountain, Stephen B. & McBeath, Michael (Ed.). Cognitive Processing in Translation and Interpreting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997. p. xi-xviii.

Snell-Hornby, Mary. Translation studies: An integrated approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins, 1988.

Sjørup, Annette C. Cognitive Effort in Metaphor Translation: An Eye-tracking and Key-logging Study. Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School, 2013. (PhD Series; No. 18.2013)

Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deidre. La relevancia: Comunicación y procesos cognitivos. Madrid: Visor, 1994.

Spolsky, Bernard. “The examination-classroom backwash cycle: Some historical cases”. In: Nunan, David; Berry, Roger & Berry, Vivien (Ed.). Bringing about change in language education. Proceedings of the International Language in Education Conference. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, 1994. p. 55-66.

Toury, Gideon. “A rationale for descriptive translation studies.” In: Hermans, Theo (Ed.). The Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1985.

Wilss, Wolfram. Knowledge and Skills in Translator Behavior. Saarbrücken: University of Saarbrücken. 1996.